From the monthly archives:

July 2006

The Church could lead

by Cynthia on July 28, 2006

As we catapult forward into the technological age, provocative questions prompt thoughtful believers in the Church today.  While some are arguing against the interest we have in technology (SBC) and that it may be waisting time, others have taken the posture that we are poised at the juncture of an incredible opportunity to use technology as a resource in our pursuit to seek, serve and share God with those who might benefit from our efforts.

In his comprehensive book Diffusion of Innovation, Everett Rogers defines diffusion as the process by which an innovation is communicated through certain channels over time among the members of a social system. The rate of adoption or diffusion rate has become an important area of research and has been utilized by many of us in research to develop a graduated set of adopter categories.  Traditionally, these categories included the innovators, the early adopters, the early majority, the late majority and the laggards.

One of the most interesting changes in the technological research landscape involves the subtle shift in the demographic profile of early adopters.  Formerly, early adopters (of new media technologies) were well-educated, white, males with a high socio-economic status and often over 40. The dot com era changed that and the early adopter profile began to skew down especially to younger ages.  Also, education frequently outweighed other attributes including creativity, entrepreneurial spirit and out-of-the-box thinking.  Currently, the gender division is giving way. The internet creates a level playing field where traditional boundaries of every sort do not exist.

What does all this have to do with the Church?  If we embrace internet technologies, especially social networking, podcasting, blogging, vlogging, then we have the opportunity to reach a larger, younger, tech-savvy audience.   Many technologies offer early adopters an advantage in the “market” or within their target audience.  The value of this audience cannot be underestimated. Our new audience will be the first technological generation, the first generation to live without the boundaries we grew up with in the 20th century. 

To some, the Church has a reputation for being out-moded, mired in tradition and lagging in relevance. Why not encourage the Church to embrace early adoption and thus manifest relevance to those outside the Church.  Make great websites, create interesting blogs, provide thoughtful, supportive communities that link individuals and encourage collaborative models. The penetration rate of the internet is reported at 73% of American adults in a recent Pew report, a saturation point it took TV 30 years of diffusion to reach.  What about the Church leading the charge, inspiring change and responding to technology as a key vehicle for the distribution of the gospel and the transformation of lives?

{ 0 comments }

How Fast Will Convergent Technologies Revolutionize the Church?

by Cynthia on July 22, 2006

It was almost 20 years ago that I received a graduate degree in Journalism from San Jose State University. I was so excited as a young, inquisitive student studying what we called the "New Media".  Living in what eventually became the Silicon Valley had a certain pre-cyberspace buzz to it. 

My specific area of research involved interviewing users of the electronic card catalog at the local public library.  As researchers, we found it fascinating that when the new card catalog system was introduced with kiosk terminals, only certain demographic sections used it. Our hypotheses proved accurate. The users were primarily white, highly-educated males. Translation – anyone who had been exposed to a computer at work and was thus was uninhibited to use an electronic system. Back then, only 1 in 50 people elected to use the new "device".

There were those of us who were studying the "Diffusion of Innovations" theory and estimating the pace at which any given innovation would diffuse or spread throughout its potential users. We knew we were looking forward into some kind of uncharted future as if through a telescope. Today, the sensation feels more like we are about to launch off the edge of a cliff with our new wings on, Leonardo di Vinci style. 

I have always been interested in looking ahead even though I consider myself moderately low-tech.  I can easily get overwhelmed when trying to program any one of the electronic appliances in my home. I love the Internet but I don’t know html and I certainly can’t put up a website in an afternoon.  Thus, I would say I’m average when it comes to the embracing of the cyberworld. 

But I’ve been thinking lately, compared to the other 4/5s of the world, I think I’m more tech-dependant than I think.  And this has caused me to reflect back on the past and peer forward into the future.  Our family consists of 2 adults and 2 school age children. We have a 4 bedroom, 2 bathroom home. Thus, we consider ourselves average. What we have physically accumulated has been steady, incrementally, over the course of an almost 20-year marriage. 

Recently, however, I’ve begun to notice a dramatic lunging forward in our technologically related purchases.  What I mean is that it has dawned on me that we have 4 television sets, 2 of them with video players and 2 of them with DVD players.  We also have 4 computers, including 2 laptops.  We have multiple cell phones, skype, 4 ipods, and 4 internet access points.  We have multi-platform computer applications and DSL broadband hookups.  We have a home network with remote printing and uploading options.

If our HP Photosmart 2610 all-in-one printer, fax, scanner copier was to go down, I don’t know how we’d get through an evening.  Without our email, we wouldn’t know if our sports practices for the day were on or off. In fact, we wouldn’t even know if they were threatened as we get our weather forecast online. We wouldn’t know which songs were to be practiced at tonight’s music practice for church or what the chords were; those come off the Internet, too. We wouldn’t know whether or not the home Bible study we attend had been moved, as sometimes occurs. Nor would we be able to find the current week’s location without, nor what the day’s school homework assignments were. I wouldn’t have access to the dinner recipes nor could I find out what my bank account balance was after 5 pm.If we’re average, boy have things changed! 

While I’ve been busy raising my family, the force and speed with which online technology has become a crucial aspect of everything that is shaping and defining our culture have over taken me like a mammoth tsunami.  This prompts a question in my mind. Will convergent technologies revolutionize the Church the way they’ve transformed our home over the course of what amounts to basically a handful of months? 

As a researcher, we certainly anticipated such a future.  But I can't honestly say we had few mechanismss to anticipate the speed/ pace/ momentum that such technologies would diffuse.  Discussion on how emerging technologies and more importantly, their applications and impacts, will redefine the operation of the Church of the future seem scarce. However, it may be worth postulating some questions and those of you who are future oriented and blogging feel free to jump in.

{ 0 comments }

Welcome to the online intersection of technology and the Church

by Cynthia on July 15, 2006

Welcome to the online intersection of technology and the Church.  This site is designed to embrace, explore, evaluate and enhance the vehicle of technology as it is used by the Church to deliver information, connect individuals and revolutionize the way we interact with our world.

Contrary to communication theory, the medium isn't the only message. The Church is poised at what will likely be the tipping point of a cultural revolution unparalled in human history. We have the opportunity to discern the signs of the times and use the explosion of innovation for our endeavors to institute changes with eternal significance.

Quite simply, welcome to a brief history of the future of the Church.

{ 0 comments }