<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Website Features on Church Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/03/19/10-top-website-features-for-churches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/03/19/10-top-website-features-for-churches/</link>
	<description>Church technology news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/03/19/10-top-website-features-for-churches/#comment-46435</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/?p=2942#comment-46435</guid>
		<description>I think that these top ten results are fairly accurate.  In my experience this is what church members are really looking for.  Ecspecially, being able to listen to sermons online.  I use that function at my church a lot.  Looking forward to seeing the results of the finished study.

Thanks!
Nathan
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atlaschurchmedia.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Church Website Design&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that these top ten results are fairly accurate.  In my experience this is what church members are really looking for.  Ecspecially, being able to listen to sermons online.  I use that function at my church a lot.  Looking forward to seeing the results of the finished study.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Nathan<br />
<a href="http://www.atlaschurchmedia.com" rel="nofollow">Church Website Design</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Three Guys and a Bible &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Church Websites Done Right – Part 3</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/03/19/10-top-website-features-for-churches/#comment-38177</link>
		<dc:creator>Three Guys and a Bible &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Church Websites Done Right – Part 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 01:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/?p=2942#comment-38177</guid>
		<description>[...] there to check out what the church had to offer. This list was created by Digital Sanctuary titled: Top 10 Website Features on Church Websites. Results come from a survey they assessed on top features/reasons visitors visited church [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there to check out what the church had to offer. This list was created by Digital Sanctuary titled: Top 10 Website Features on Church Websites. Results come from a survey they assessed on top features/reasons visitors visited church [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/03/19/10-top-website-features-for-churches/#comment-21439</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/?p=2942#comment-21439</guid>
		<description>This is a very good tool for churches to consider.  However, it also reflects where the church&#039;s culture may be coming up short.  Each of the previous postings expresses their certain area of like/dislike: political scientist, evangelist, etc.  I am sure we would hear things from those motivate by worship or passion.

As &#039;fishers of men&#039;, we really need to consider...with wisdom, what are we trying to accomplish.  Any viable church will want to have their site divided into 2 segments: Unchurched and churched.  The unchurched are crying for completely different items than the churched.  

Keep it simple and ask questions of both groups.  Then, ask different age groups (13 to 18, then 22 to 35 and so on).  

Lastly, when considering the look/feel of the site design...stay away from designing the site based on what members like to see.  NO one leaves a church because the design does not speak to me.  Think of it this way...the design of the site is not about the senior pastor.  As a pastor myself, I have to overcome my insecurity and focus on those outside our circles.

Visitors to your site can be impacted by what they see in the first 3 to 5 seconds.  A lot of old white people...might not meet the the level of the young 23 year old Hmong college student.  Lots of doves and crosses...you are preaching to the choir and nota young call-girl whose grandfather was an old time fundamentalist preacher who disowned her.

Please brothers and sisters...we have access to the greatest creative source of all!  Let&#039;s be as the sons of Issacar, &#039;men who understood the times, with knowledge of what Israel should do</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very good tool for churches to consider.  However, it also reflects where the church&#8217;s culture may be coming up short.  Each of the previous postings expresses their certain area of like/dislike: political scientist, evangelist, etc.  I am sure we would hear things from those motivate by worship or passion.</p>
<p>As &#8216;fishers of men&#8217;, we really need to consider&#8230;with wisdom, what are we trying to accomplish.  Any viable church will want to have their site divided into 2 segments: Unchurched and churched.  The unchurched are crying for completely different items than the churched.  </p>
<p>Keep it simple and ask questions of both groups.  Then, ask different age groups (13 to 18, then 22 to 35 and so on).  </p>
<p>Lastly, when considering the look/feel of the site design&#8230;stay away from designing the site based on what members like to see.  NO one leaves a church because the design does not speak to me.  Think of it this way&#8230;the design of the site is not about the senior pastor.  As a pastor myself, I have to overcome my insecurity and focus on those outside our circles.</p>
<p>Visitors to your site can be impacted by what they see in the first 3 to 5 seconds.  A lot of old white people&#8230;might not meet the the level of the young 23 year old Hmong college student.  Lots of doves and crosses&#8230;you are preaching to the choir and nota young call-girl whose grandfather was an old time fundamentalist preacher who disowned her.</p>
<p>Please brothers and sisters&#8230;we have access to the greatest creative source of all!  Let&#8217;s be as the sons of Issacar, &#8216;men who understood the times, with knowledge of what Israel should do</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prodigal</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/03/19/10-top-website-features-for-churches/#comment-21222</link>
		<dc:creator>Prodigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/?p=2942#comment-21222</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t this beg the question: &quot;What should be the top ten features be?&quot;

This survey is a snapshot of how things are now. I notice that there&#039;s no reference to using the church website for outreach or evangelism. Why do so many reach out and touch so often with technology but not the church? I notice that mega-churches have already figured this out.
It&#039;s no big surprise that evangelism is once again the forgotten one.

I exhort Christian America to catch up with the phones-es and start using &lt;a href=&quot;http://prodigalweb.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;websites, social networking, texting and every other relevant technology&lt;/a&gt; to reach out to its neighbors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t this beg the question: &#8220;What should be the top ten features be?&#8221;</p>
<p>This survey is a snapshot of how things are now. I notice that there&#8217;s no reference to using the church website for outreach or evangelism. Why do so many reach out and touch so often with technology but not the church? I notice that mega-churches have already figured this out.<br />
It&#8217;s no big surprise that evangelism is once again the forgotten one.</p>
<p>I exhort Christian America to catch up with the phones-es and start using <a href="http://prodigalweb.net" rel="nofollow">websites, social networking, texting and every other relevant technology</a> to reach out to its neighbors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev Peter Thomas</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/03/19/10-top-website-features-for-churches/#comment-21101</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev Peter Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/?p=2942#comment-21101</guid>
		<description>Incredibly useful as we continue to redesign our church website!

But I wonder what kinds of churches they relate to. Presumably mostly U.S. but also I suspect larger than most churches in UK would be. Items 6 and 8 would never be done via the web in most UK churches - people would just phone and speak to the Minister/Pastor directly.

 www.pbthomas.com/blog     www.pbthomas.libsyn.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incredibly useful as we continue to redesign our church website!</p>
<p>But I wonder what kinds of churches they relate to. Presumably mostly U.S. but also I suspect larger than most churches in UK would be. Items 6 and 8 would never be done via the web in most UK churches &#8211; people would just phone and speak to the Minister/Pastor directly.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.pbthomas.com/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbthomas.com/blog</a>     <a href="http://www.pbthomas.libsyn.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbthomas.libsyn.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What People Look for on Church Websites at neoLeader</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/03/19/10-top-website-features-for-churches/#comment-21002</link>
		<dc:creator>What People Look for on Church Websites at neoLeader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/?p=2942#comment-21002</guid>
		<description>[...] of you are involved in church leadership. Top 10 Features on Church Websites highlights, from extensive surveying, what people are actually looking for on your church&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of you are involved in church leadership. Top 10 Features on Church Websites highlights, from extensive surveying, what people are actually looking for on your church&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Eige</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/03/19/10-top-website-features-for-churches/#comment-20985</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Eige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/?p=2942#comment-20985</guid>
		<description>Cynthia,
I&#039;m interested in the data relating to who filled out the survey. Did you get any demographics on who they are and how it relates to their typical web usage? It&#039;s the political scientist in me coming out, I always like to know the data behind the data.

As to reading pastor&#039;s blogs, yeah no one reads mine!! I have my Twitter linked to my Facebook status and those receive way more &quot;page views&quot; than my blog! 

This list is great, as I read it I thought about our website and how it matches up, I&#039;d say we get a B- as to what people are looking for. Everything on there is on our site except the last two and transcripts  people really want to read that? Maybe if it was in Kindle format?? What got me thinking beyond that is how is our site structured so as to get the most pertinent information folks are looking for to them in the most efficient way. It isn&#039;t enough to just have the info somewhere, it needs to be where people expect to find it. Personally, I think that&#039;s something our church website could do a little better, but it would mean a major redesign, which would mean major $$. 

As always, great stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cynthia,<br />
I&#8217;m interested in the data relating to who filled out the survey. Did you get any demographics on who they are and how it relates to their typical web usage? It&#8217;s the political scientist in me coming out, I always like to know the data behind the data.</p>
<p>As to reading pastor&#8217;s blogs, yeah no one reads mine!! I have my Twitter linked to my Facebook status and those receive way more &#8220;page views&#8221; than my blog! </p>
<p>This list is great, as I read it I thought about our website and how it matches up, I&#8217;d say we get a B- as to what people are looking for. Everything on there is on our site except the last two and transcripts  people really want to read that? Maybe if it was in Kindle format?? What got me thinking beyond that is how is our site structured so as to get the most pertinent information folks are looking for to them in the most efficient way. It isn&#8217;t enough to just have the info somewhere, it needs to be where people expect to find it. Personally, I think that&#8217;s something our church website could do a little better, but it would mean a major redesign, which would mean major $$. </p>
<p>As always, great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Goodmanson</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/03/19/10-top-website-features-for-churches/#comment-20713</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Goodmanson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/?p=2942#comment-20713</guid>
		<description>Kevin - On Q1 it captures the church but yes, we noticed that Survey Monkey made you select a church as well.  It did record that you are from &quot;McKinney Fellowship&quot;.  On Q12  it worked for me, it should only take 5 answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin &#8211; On Q1 it captures the church but yes, we noticed that Survey Monkey made you select a church as well.  It did record that you are from &#8220;McKinney Fellowship&#8221;.  On Q12  it worked for me, it should only take 5 answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Miller</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/03/19/10-top-website-features-for-churches/#comment-20666</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/?p=2942#comment-20666</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the results are accurate.  
The survey did not work properly for me.  It made me select a church even though I was writing mine in.  The Q12 would not let me fill it out properly - it only took 5 answers for all the areas rather than letting you pick 1 to 5 for each item.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the results are accurate.<br />
The survey did not work properly for me.  It made me select a church even though I was writing mine in.  The Q12 would not let me fill it out properly &#8211; it only took 5 answers for all the areas rather than letting you pick 1 to 5 for each item.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Love</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/03/19/10-top-website-features-for-churches/#comment-20591</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/?p=2942#comment-20591</guid>
		<description>[...] do people want from your church website; this one is a link tag for me [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do people want from your church website; this one is a link tag for me [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
