<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Digital Sanctuary &#187; Google Wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/tag/google-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org</link>
	<description>Church technology news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:14:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google Wave = The Death of Email?</title>
		<link>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/10/15/google-wave-the-death-of-email/</link>
		<comments>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/10/15/google-wave-the-death-of-email/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real time typing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/?p=4308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you likely know, I have a particular aversion to just throwing up videos for the sake of &#8220;instant&#8221; blogging.  Yet, for the first time, I&#8217;ve done it twice in a row.   Not really sure why.   I guess I&#8217;m more observing and absorbing rather than being in a place to provide any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fthedigitalsanctuary.org%2F2009%2F10%2F15%2Fgoogle-wave-the-death-of-email%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fthedigitalsanctuary.org%2F2009%2F10%2F15%2Fgoogle-wave-the-death-of-email%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div><p><a href="http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/10/15/google-wave-the-death-of-email/"><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p>
<p>As you likely know, I have a particular aversion to just throwing up videos for the sake of &#8220;instant&#8221; blogging.  Yet, for the first time, I&#8217;ve done it twice in a row.   Not really sure why.   I guess I&#8217;m more observing and absorbing rather than being in a place to provide any reflections.   I&#8217;ve only been a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Wave">Google Wave</a> participant for a week but, well to quote Fergie, &#8220;I&#8217;ve got a feeling&#8230;.&#8221;  I think <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Wave">Google Wave</a> could really be a communications game changer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m swimming in the newest technologies, navigating the firehose as they say, looking ahead beyond the Wave.   Seems everyone is sort of up in arms about the effectiveness of real time typing&#8230;.. but what I&#8217;m thinking about is, well, to pull it straight from <a href="http://wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a> &#8220;Speech synthesis &#8211; A computer system used for this purpose is called a speech synthesizer, and can be implemented in software or hardware. A text-to-speech (TTS) system converts normal language text into speech; other systems render symbolic linguistic representations like phonetic transcriptions into speech.&#8221;</p>
<p>Omnivores &#8211; aren&#8217;t we right around the corner from a voice markup language, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_Synthesis_Markup_Language">SSML</a> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesseract_(software)">Tesseract</a> has a disabled code for a handwriting markup language)?   Oh, where are my voice recognition futurists&#8230;. <a href="http://twitter.com/terrystorch">@terrystorch</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/human3rror">@JohnSaddington</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/samsoffes">@samsoffes</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/tonysteward">@tonysteward</a> @alldevelopers   @anyone?   Where are we?  Is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Wave">Google Wave</a> as significant as it seems?</p>
<p>For inspiration you can see <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5381219/google-waves-best-use-cases">Lifehacker</a><a href="http://lifehacker.com/5381219/google-waves-best-use-cases"> &#8211; Google Wave Best Use Cases</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thedigitalsanctuary.org/2009/10/15/google-wave-the-death-of-email/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

