In an attempt to document the migration back and forth between offline and online communications, it’s worth noting that a handful of Christian organizations are taking advantage of micro-blogging (a relatively new form of life streaming) and setting up Twitter accounts for their “followers”.  Of course, they’re not the only ones.  Twitter is also being used by:

• celebrities                            http://twitter.com/mrskutcher
• sports teams                        http://twitter.com/lakersnation
• news organizations            http://twitter.com/cnnbrk
• governmental agencies     http://twitter.com/LAFD
• industry leaders                 http://twitter.com/TechCrunch

Just to name a few.

As far as Twitter pages being set up by Christians, there are more and more pastors, church staff, layleaders, churches, and Christian professionals joining the ranks of the twitterverse.  Some examples include:

• bands & musicians             http://twitter.com/leelandmooring
• church denominations      http://twitter.com/wearefoursquare
• youth groups                       http://twitter.com/newhopeyouth
• churches                               http://twitter.com/newspring
• book authors                       http://twitter.com/donmilleris
• CEO’s                                    http://twitter.com/michaelhyatt
• magazines                            http://twitter.com/CollideMagazine

The blossoming “status update” genre is worth paying attention to and if you have no idea what to “do” with twitter you can find links galore at this site:

• master blogger     http://twitter.com/problogger aka Darren Rowse
• master blogger     http://www.twitip.com/ aka Darren Rowse

You can also follow me here:       http://twitter.com/cynthiaware

And more importantly, it’s Friday – Who do you #followfriday?

The recent Southern California minor earthquake caused a flurry of tweets in the twitterverse.  This is what it looks like on a Twitter-graph.

Twitter, the micro-blogging or social messaging service (SMS) has been embraced by communication's early adopters but hasn't spread in terms of mainstream acceptability yet.  In fact, according to Wikipedia, Twitter has only 2,200,000 users.

Furthermore, it's proven somewhat (how's that for diplomatic?) unreliable by users.  Thus 'serious updaters' have remained uneasy and investigate other services and options for universal status updates.  (See – Read Write Web's Six Ways to Update Your Status.)

Although Twitter has been talked about frequently at Digital, many unconverted still think of it as a narcissistic, time-wasting, pointless, squandering of words.  They are of the "who cares what I'm doing right now?" camp.  Prudent Christians think carefully about stewardship issues and where we invest our time is important. 

But bear with us over at Digital.  Twitter can be a bit of a surprise.  It has an unexpected way of creating links, forging bonds, developing certain degrees of intimacy and spawning mini-communities.  And when it comes to the Church, that may make micro-messaging hugely important.

Micro-blogging has hidden attributes that we are just now discovering.  Take, for example, the recent Los Angeles' shaker.  When the earthquake hit, I was sitting at my desk with 2 computers up – one on a twitter page. 

I saw a trusted friend in my area of SoCal say in a tweet – earthquake.

I shifted everything I was doing to pay attention and look for a confirming tweet.

I received one within 5 seconds from another friend – about 60 miles away.

I observed multiple confirmations within 10 seconds, all from SoCal locals.

I, myself, began reporting from my location via tweets.

I began checking in with my network of twittering friends since my phone lines were down.

I began answering tweets from worried twitter friends across country.

I realized my network of locals was the most immediate & accessible source of info.

I had 10 people add me as a twitter connection within hours.

I predicted that twitter might be as news-worthy as the earthquake.  

LA Times next day twitter coverage.

You can follow my journey by simply going to my account (http://twitter.com/cynthiaware) and scrolling backwards. 

This incident galvanized my feelings about Twitter – it's not about the news; it's about people.  It's about relationships; it's about who connects to who.  When do those connections happen and when are they the most meaningful.  It seems that in little episodes of micro-connecting, relationships are created. 

Increasingly, as the relationship economy emerges, our networks of trusted "friends" will grow more vital.  The communication tools we use to support them, whether email, cell calls or tweets, have inherent value.  Maybe, as prudent Christians, we will change our view from time spent online to time invested.

Last December, The Pew Internet & American Life Project put out the results of a provocative survey entitled Digital Footprints: Online identity management and search in the age of transparency. 

Compiled by Mary Madden, Susannah Fox, Aaron Smith, et. al., you can view a PDF of the Digital Footprint report here.  The survey spotlighted the question "Are internet users are becoming more aware of their digital footprints."  Respondents revealed:

* 47% have searched for information about themselves online, up from just 22% five years ago.

However, few monitor their online presence with great regularity.

* Just 3% of self-searchers report that they make a regular habit of it.

* 74% have checked up on their digital footprints only once or twice.

* Fully 60% of internet users say they are not worried about how much information is available

   about them online.

* Similarly, the majority of online adults (61%) do not feel compelled to limit the amount of

   information that can be found about them online.

I found the survey provocative not because we have digital footprints but more importantly, not many people are thinking about it. 

Indeed, most internet users are not concerned about the amount of information available about them online, and most do not take steps to limit, govern or direct that information.

Active Digital footprints are one thing.  Your passive digital footprint, or digital shadow, however, is an even more obscure set of data and quite another thing altogether.  It may include things like:

* your high school or elementary school photo
* your prescription medicines – uploaded for storage by pharmacists
* your driver's license records
* zabasearch records
* your college transcripts
* your charitable organizations memberships
* races or competitions you have been registered in
* boats, trains and other forms of transportation you have used  
* tax records
* mortgage records
* voter records
* PTA and school newsletter mentions

and most importantly, for our discussion, your tweets and your @replies. 

Better search your exact Twitter user name right now and every twitpic that has your @name attached to it, like this one of me I found on page 1 of a google search.  Fortunately, it was put up by a friend and basically with permission but in the Age of Transparency there will be great loss of privacy.  I know of quite a handful of online photos that are up on Twitter and the person in the photo is unaware of their existence, much less their searchablity.

We should also likely check out our accounts at Dodgeball, Jaiku, Pownce, Plurk, Spoink and a list of others.

The Age of Transparency is upon us.  Accountablity vs. loss of privacy?  What are the pros and cons for you?